Fozzik
07-17-2005, 10:49 AM
07/27/2005 EDIT: Some prices are moving around a bit... the case and the new RAM I picked out are cheaper, and the processor and motherboard actually got more expensive. =( I'll try to keep things updated.
08/20/2005 EDIT: Prices continue to move, and I've changed some things again. I was able to now step the CPU up a notch for the same price, I've changed cases (due to wanting some improved cooling and various other things), and I may very well change motherboards.
Although I'm not making the purchase yet, I've basically come to a decision on everything except for the video card. I'm going to wait as long as I can (I'll be a part of Vanguard beta, so I won't be able to wait for release of the game). Not only because prices always go down, but also because I'm hoping beyond hope that we'll see developments on the graphics front, like ATI's long-delayed release of their next-gen chip, and maybe some more modestly priced (and better price/performance) new-generation options from both Nvidia and ATI.
At the highest end, Nvidia and ATI are generally very competitive...so I don't feel too bad about Sigil having a marketing/testing deal with ATI. If both Nvidia and ATI have close to the same performance at the same price point, I'll go with ATI and not look back.
So, here's what I'm planning to get. Some things might change, but for the most part it's probably set. I'll try to explain my thinking behind each component. Prices are from Newegg.com, I like to try to buy everything from one place when I can...so it all shows up and I can get to building without too much wait.
Operating system
Windows XP Pro, SP2.
Not much reasoning required here, Windows is pretty much the only choice for a gaming system...and Vanguard is being paid for by Microsoft. I won't be holding my breath for a Linux version. ;) I picked the professional version because of my dual-core processor...I know in the past that only the pro version supported dual processors. I'm not positive that's still the case, but I don't mind spending a bit more to be on the safe side.
OEM version - $142
Processor
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
I decided that since I generally keep a computer for 2+ years without many changes, dual-core was the way to go. Dual-core offers smoother multitasking and some nice speedups in a few programs right now, and it also offers the promise of big performance gains as more applications and games start taking advantage of multiple CPU-Intensive threads.
With the dual-core decision made, the choice of AMD or Intel was not very tough. Since I have the money to spend, I mainly looked at performance. Across the board, and especially in the case of gaming, AMD's dual-core processors win hands down. Not only do they perform better across most applications, they also run cooler and use less power. Also, because I can drop an AMD dual-core chip into the very mature motherboards based on the Nforce 4 939-pin platform, I save money and am better assured of stability.
I picked the 4200+ model because all the performance is there, and its price is still within reason. I looked at the 4400+ as well, because I feel the larger cache size may make more of a difference in the future, but I just couldn't see it justifying the currently much higher price. I've now switched to the 4400+, considering it has dropped to the price I was originally going to pay for the 4200+.
Althon X2 4400+ Retail box with fan - $546
Motherboard
The Nforce 4 chipset from Nvidia is a very mature, very high-performing platform that is absolutely packed with features. Also, many manufacturers are offering very attractive prices these days because the chipset has been around long enough to be optimized.
EDIT (08/26/05) -
Well, I've decided to get the ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, for a number of reasons.
First off, just about every one of them already comes with the version 1005 BIOS loaded, which supports dual-core and means I don't need to deal with flashing it right off the bat. Secondly, and this is probably the single biggest factor, this motherboard is passively cooled. It has a heatsink and heat pipe on the motherboard chip, which means no moving parts...No high-RPM fan like most other Nforce 4 boards. Quiet is a good thing, and no moving parts means it is much more reliable (If the passive cooling works effectively, of course...and my research says that in the case of this mobo, it works very well).
Another thing that pushed me over to this board is the falling prices on other components. It's now pretty easy to fit the extra cost into my budget, and motherboards really aren't a place to skimp on the quality or features. The A8N-SLI Premium comes with everything and the kitchen sink, including switching chips for the SLI, which means you can go from single to dual video card in the BIOS (no need to crack open the case and move things around like most SLI boards). Most of what I have read says this board is rock stable and has very complete BIOS options (obviously not as many as some overclocking-oriented boards...but I'm not going to overclock).
Retail ASUS A8N-SLI Premium package - $176
RAM - Main System Memory
I started looking at this with two things in mind. Clock speed is pretty much a non-issue for the time being on the AMD side of the house. PC3200 DDRRAM works great with the Athlon 64 and provides the bandwidth it needs to shine, and I don't overclock. With clock speed out of the way, I wanted 2GB, and I wanted good low timings. I think 2GB of RAM is on the verge of becoming common in gaming systems, and some games will already make use of more than 1GB if it's available. I wanted low timings because I didn't want to have to sacrifice too much with the bump in size.
07/27/2005 EDIT:Well, I told you this might happen... I changed my mind on the RAM (maybe not for the last time). OCZ is offering a 2GB kit with very nice timings (2-3-2-5), and I'm reading that with the Nforce 4, people aren't having any problems with it running at those timings at a 1T command rate. I know I mentioned somewhere that I had emailed OCZ tech support about their command rates, and found out they test at 2T...but after more research, it looks like just about all memory manufacturers do that, and most good quality RAM will handle a 1T command rate when you only populate two slots on the motherboard. OCZ has been coming on strong in the last couple years, and is a solid name for memory. Also, it's a little cheaper than my old choice. ;)
Retail package - $270
Video card
Here's where the trouble starts. I want a current-gen card. At release, Vanguard will be able to push any system available past its limits, and I want solid performance. I'm looking for mid-high resolution (1280x1024 or 1680x1050 if I get a flat panel), I want anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering, and I want to turn on at least some of the eye candy features (like HDR lighting). For this I know I'm going to need to open my wallet. I'm prepared to spend as much as $600 for the video card alone, but right now, for current generation cards, I only have one choice.
The Geforce 7800GTX. I would have no problem going with this card if I get the beta email tomorrow and have to make my purchase. Not only does the 7800GTX offer fantastic performance (especially in shader-heavy new and upcoming games), it also offers transparency anti-aliasing, which is a dramatic improvement over other types of AA if the horsepower is there to run it. Being able to get anti-aliasing inside of transparent textures will make the trees and grass in Vanguard look much better.
With all that said, a lot of signs point to ATI's R520 being even stronger in raw performance. I would really like to wait, not only because Sigil has a deal with ATI, but also because it might offer more performance for the money. Choices are good. I might still end up picking the Nvidia card...but at least I would have options. A lot will just depend on when ATI finally is able to get yields of their new chip up to an acceptable level. Most rumors are putting the launch either next month or the month after, and I might not have that long to wait.
Video card retail box - $600
Storage
Hard drives aren't really that tough to pick out right now. They are very cheap, and most of them are fairly close in performance. I wanted the fastest game loading times and lowest latency I could get, and usually that is always a function of rotation speed (and also density). The Western Digital Raptor is an obvious choice with its 10k RPM. However, the Raptor has been out for quite a long time now and hasn't changed. Its price hasn't changed either, since it has basically no competition as the only 10k RPM desktop SATA drive.
Other companies have been making improvements to their 7200 RPM drives, and they are catching up with the Raptor in performance. The rotation speed is the same, but just about everyone has been increasing the density of their platters. More data in a smaller area means the heads have a shorter distance to travel when they want to read/write...so performance goes up. In fact, there are some that even beat the Raptor in game loading performance now. The Raptor is probably still the best-performing single drive... but I don't think the slight edge it offers is worth the much higher price.
I wanted great performance, a fairly large capacity, and I didn't want to spend more than I had to. I figured there was no contest with the Raptor's performance, so I was prepared to pay almost double the price per megabyte in order to have the 10k monster. It turns out though, there are 7200 RPM drives that don't give up much performance, offer much larger sizes, and are a lot cheaper. Also, support for NCQ factored into my search for a hard drive, since it's been shown that in some multi-tasking scenarios, NCQ can make a big difference in performance. My motherboard supports NCQ, so why not have a drive that can do it?
You'll notice I didn't mention RAID. There is absolutely no reason to do a striped RAID array on a desktop computer. It gives you very little to no additional performance, and basically doubles the chances that you'll loose all your data. Oh, and you get to pay extra for that. A RAID 1 mirrored array makes some sense from a data security standpoint, but I back up to another drive anyway, so I don't need to deal with the slight performance hit that RAID 1 causes.
I picked the Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 250GB drive. It's got the capacity, the performance, and a really nice price.
OEM drive - $112
Sound card
I've already got a Soundblaster Audigy, and I'll be moving that over to my new system. There really isn't a very good reason to spend money on a sound card right now, because Creative Labs has a next-generation sound chip on the way, called the X-Fi. All the buzz around the web points to this new chip being a dramatic improvement in sound...and I think I'll wait for that. Among its features is the ability to produce stunning 3D audio (in real time) using stereo headphones.
Audigy from old system - $0
Case and power supply
I'm generally very annoyed about ATX cases. I think case manufacturers are doing a pretty lousy job, but I won't start ranting about it now. Here's what I'm looking for in a case -
Easy to build in (well laid out, good space on the inside)
Quiet
Good airflow/cooling
Something not hideously ugly
I have been continually amazed at how difficult it is to find a mid-tower ATX case that fits those criteria.
I've decided to go with a ThermalTake Tsunami case. It has decent looks, two 120mm fans for front and back and a 90mm fan that blows almost directly onto the CPU and Video card. I like the cooling setup, as well as the size and layout inside. It's going to be a little louder than the Lanboy case I picked out previously... but I need some slightly more serious cooling I think, based on the video card and CPU choices I've made.
I've actually purchased the Tsunami case now (as you might have read in another thread) so this is off the list. I got it for $70 at CompUSA...a deal I couldn't refuse.
For power supplies, I wanted something up to date that would support the rather...well...massive demands of CPUs and graphics cards these days and in the future. Also I wanted to try and cut down the number of adaptors, so I wanted something with connectors for PCI-Express graphics cards, SATA, and a 24-pin power for the motherboard. I also like what some manufacturers are doing with cooling in power supplies now, offering a single 120mm fan. This will make it almost silent, but offer excellent cooling if things start heating up.
It's a very basic rule with power supplies that the cooler they are, the better they work. It's always a good idea to buy more power supply than you need, because if it's not working hard, it will stay cool and provide the best power. I chose the Antec TruPower II 550W, for all the above reasons, and because I've had great experiences with Antec power supplies in the past. It offers 2 separate 12V rails, both pushing 19 Amps. Good stuff.
Antec TruPowerII 550W - $105
Optical drives
It's time to get a DVD drive. Whether it's a reader or a writer, the technology is mature, it's fast, and the capacity is essential for games these days. Nobody wants to install a game using 10 CDs.
DVD burners are pretty much a no-brainer, they burn and read everything, including dual-layer DVDs, and they cost so little. I've done a lot of reading and I've come no closer to knowing what brand is best to buy...but I've liked Samsung products in the past, so I'll go with them and tell you if it sucks. ;) There's an NEC for the same price... it got lots of good reviews...maybe I'll just flip a coin.
Samsung DVD burner (16x-4x-12x blah blah 5x DL) - $50 for retail box with Nero software
Monitor, keybord, mouse, speakers
07/27/2005 EDIT: Ok, I caved in and bought a Dell 2405FPW 24" flat panel. The panel itself is manufactured by Samsung, and is very good (maybe not quite as good as the SIPS panels from LG Phillips, but darn close). It's larger than its closest competition by an inch, and I got it with an internet coupon for $803 and free shipping. I couldn't say no. Now I'm definitely going to need that new-gen video card, to push Vanguard at 1920x1200. :D
For keyboards and mice, I don't think I'll be "upgrading". I use a microsoft trackball explorer (yes, I'm one of three gamers in the world who use a trackball) and it works great. I might go after a keyboard that's a little quieter than the one I have now, to quiet complaints from my wife about my heavy-handed typing, but I don't see myself spending more than about $50 on anything.
I use a fairly high-quality set of stereo headphones, from Panasonic. I'll be sticking with those, so I can enjoy my music or gaming without bugging the rest of the household.
So, currently that's what I'm looking at getting. Here's a summary -
Windows XP Pro SP2
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, Nforce4 SLI motherboard
2GB OCZ PC3200 DDRRAM dual-channel kit
Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 250GB SATA Hard drive
New-gen video card
Thermaltake Tsunami case
Antec TrupowerII 550W power supply
Samsung or NEC DVD DL burner
I'll keep you updated if I decide to make changes, and I'll certainly argue with...um, I mean discuss with...anyone who wants to make suggestions/comments/whatever.
08/20/2005 EDIT: Prices continue to move, and I've changed some things again. I was able to now step the CPU up a notch for the same price, I've changed cases (due to wanting some improved cooling and various other things), and I may very well change motherboards.
Although I'm not making the purchase yet, I've basically come to a decision on everything except for the video card. I'm going to wait as long as I can (I'll be a part of Vanguard beta, so I won't be able to wait for release of the game). Not only because prices always go down, but also because I'm hoping beyond hope that we'll see developments on the graphics front, like ATI's long-delayed release of their next-gen chip, and maybe some more modestly priced (and better price/performance) new-generation options from both Nvidia and ATI.
At the highest end, Nvidia and ATI are generally very competitive...so I don't feel too bad about Sigil having a marketing/testing deal with ATI. If both Nvidia and ATI have close to the same performance at the same price point, I'll go with ATI and not look back.
So, here's what I'm planning to get. Some things might change, but for the most part it's probably set. I'll try to explain my thinking behind each component. Prices are from Newegg.com, I like to try to buy everything from one place when I can...so it all shows up and I can get to building without too much wait.
Operating system
Windows XP Pro, SP2.
Not much reasoning required here, Windows is pretty much the only choice for a gaming system...and Vanguard is being paid for by Microsoft. I won't be holding my breath for a Linux version. ;) I picked the professional version because of my dual-core processor...I know in the past that only the pro version supported dual processors. I'm not positive that's still the case, but I don't mind spending a bit more to be on the safe side.
OEM version - $142
Processor
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
I decided that since I generally keep a computer for 2+ years without many changes, dual-core was the way to go. Dual-core offers smoother multitasking and some nice speedups in a few programs right now, and it also offers the promise of big performance gains as more applications and games start taking advantage of multiple CPU-Intensive threads.
With the dual-core decision made, the choice of AMD or Intel was not very tough. Since I have the money to spend, I mainly looked at performance. Across the board, and especially in the case of gaming, AMD's dual-core processors win hands down. Not only do they perform better across most applications, they also run cooler and use less power. Also, because I can drop an AMD dual-core chip into the very mature motherboards based on the Nforce 4 939-pin platform, I save money and am better assured of stability.
I picked the 4200+ model because all the performance is there, and its price is still within reason. I looked at the 4400+ as well, because I feel the larger cache size may make more of a difference in the future, but I just couldn't see it justifying the currently much higher price. I've now switched to the 4400+, considering it has dropped to the price I was originally going to pay for the 4200+.
Althon X2 4400+ Retail box with fan - $546
Motherboard
The Nforce 4 chipset from Nvidia is a very mature, very high-performing platform that is absolutely packed with features. Also, many manufacturers are offering very attractive prices these days because the chipset has been around long enough to be optimized.
EDIT (08/26/05) -
Well, I've decided to get the ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, for a number of reasons.
First off, just about every one of them already comes with the version 1005 BIOS loaded, which supports dual-core and means I don't need to deal with flashing it right off the bat. Secondly, and this is probably the single biggest factor, this motherboard is passively cooled. It has a heatsink and heat pipe on the motherboard chip, which means no moving parts...No high-RPM fan like most other Nforce 4 boards. Quiet is a good thing, and no moving parts means it is much more reliable (If the passive cooling works effectively, of course...and my research says that in the case of this mobo, it works very well).
Another thing that pushed me over to this board is the falling prices on other components. It's now pretty easy to fit the extra cost into my budget, and motherboards really aren't a place to skimp on the quality or features. The A8N-SLI Premium comes with everything and the kitchen sink, including switching chips for the SLI, which means you can go from single to dual video card in the BIOS (no need to crack open the case and move things around like most SLI boards). Most of what I have read says this board is rock stable and has very complete BIOS options (obviously not as many as some overclocking-oriented boards...but I'm not going to overclock).
Retail ASUS A8N-SLI Premium package - $176
RAM - Main System Memory
I started looking at this with two things in mind. Clock speed is pretty much a non-issue for the time being on the AMD side of the house. PC3200 DDRRAM works great with the Athlon 64 and provides the bandwidth it needs to shine, and I don't overclock. With clock speed out of the way, I wanted 2GB, and I wanted good low timings. I think 2GB of RAM is on the verge of becoming common in gaming systems, and some games will already make use of more than 1GB if it's available. I wanted low timings because I didn't want to have to sacrifice too much with the bump in size.
07/27/2005 EDIT:Well, I told you this might happen... I changed my mind on the RAM (maybe not for the last time). OCZ is offering a 2GB kit with very nice timings (2-3-2-5), and I'm reading that with the Nforce 4, people aren't having any problems with it running at those timings at a 1T command rate. I know I mentioned somewhere that I had emailed OCZ tech support about their command rates, and found out they test at 2T...but after more research, it looks like just about all memory manufacturers do that, and most good quality RAM will handle a 1T command rate when you only populate two slots on the motherboard. OCZ has been coming on strong in the last couple years, and is a solid name for memory. Also, it's a little cheaper than my old choice. ;)
Retail package - $270
Video card
Here's where the trouble starts. I want a current-gen card. At release, Vanguard will be able to push any system available past its limits, and I want solid performance. I'm looking for mid-high resolution (1280x1024 or 1680x1050 if I get a flat panel), I want anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering, and I want to turn on at least some of the eye candy features (like HDR lighting). For this I know I'm going to need to open my wallet. I'm prepared to spend as much as $600 for the video card alone, but right now, for current generation cards, I only have one choice.
The Geforce 7800GTX. I would have no problem going with this card if I get the beta email tomorrow and have to make my purchase. Not only does the 7800GTX offer fantastic performance (especially in shader-heavy new and upcoming games), it also offers transparency anti-aliasing, which is a dramatic improvement over other types of AA if the horsepower is there to run it. Being able to get anti-aliasing inside of transparent textures will make the trees and grass in Vanguard look much better.
With all that said, a lot of signs point to ATI's R520 being even stronger in raw performance. I would really like to wait, not only because Sigil has a deal with ATI, but also because it might offer more performance for the money. Choices are good. I might still end up picking the Nvidia card...but at least I would have options. A lot will just depend on when ATI finally is able to get yields of their new chip up to an acceptable level. Most rumors are putting the launch either next month or the month after, and I might not have that long to wait.
Video card retail box - $600
Storage
Hard drives aren't really that tough to pick out right now. They are very cheap, and most of them are fairly close in performance. I wanted the fastest game loading times and lowest latency I could get, and usually that is always a function of rotation speed (and also density). The Western Digital Raptor is an obvious choice with its 10k RPM. However, the Raptor has been out for quite a long time now and hasn't changed. Its price hasn't changed either, since it has basically no competition as the only 10k RPM desktop SATA drive.
Other companies have been making improvements to their 7200 RPM drives, and they are catching up with the Raptor in performance. The rotation speed is the same, but just about everyone has been increasing the density of their platters. More data in a smaller area means the heads have a shorter distance to travel when they want to read/write...so performance goes up. In fact, there are some that even beat the Raptor in game loading performance now. The Raptor is probably still the best-performing single drive... but I don't think the slight edge it offers is worth the much higher price.
I wanted great performance, a fairly large capacity, and I didn't want to spend more than I had to. I figured there was no contest with the Raptor's performance, so I was prepared to pay almost double the price per megabyte in order to have the 10k monster. It turns out though, there are 7200 RPM drives that don't give up much performance, offer much larger sizes, and are a lot cheaper. Also, support for NCQ factored into my search for a hard drive, since it's been shown that in some multi-tasking scenarios, NCQ can make a big difference in performance. My motherboard supports NCQ, so why not have a drive that can do it?
You'll notice I didn't mention RAID. There is absolutely no reason to do a striped RAID array on a desktop computer. It gives you very little to no additional performance, and basically doubles the chances that you'll loose all your data. Oh, and you get to pay extra for that. A RAID 1 mirrored array makes some sense from a data security standpoint, but I back up to another drive anyway, so I don't need to deal with the slight performance hit that RAID 1 causes.
I picked the Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 250GB drive. It's got the capacity, the performance, and a really nice price.
OEM drive - $112
Sound card
I've already got a Soundblaster Audigy, and I'll be moving that over to my new system. There really isn't a very good reason to spend money on a sound card right now, because Creative Labs has a next-generation sound chip on the way, called the X-Fi. All the buzz around the web points to this new chip being a dramatic improvement in sound...and I think I'll wait for that. Among its features is the ability to produce stunning 3D audio (in real time) using stereo headphones.
Audigy from old system - $0
Case and power supply
I'm generally very annoyed about ATX cases. I think case manufacturers are doing a pretty lousy job, but I won't start ranting about it now. Here's what I'm looking for in a case -
Easy to build in (well laid out, good space on the inside)
Quiet
Good airflow/cooling
Something not hideously ugly
I have been continually amazed at how difficult it is to find a mid-tower ATX case that fits those criteria.
I've decided to go with a ThermalTake Tsunami case. It has decent looks, two 120mm fans for front and back and a 90mm fan that blows almost directly onto the CPU and Video card. I like the cooling setup, as well as the size and layout inside. It's going to be a little louder than the Lanboy case I picked out previously... but I need some slightly more serious cooling I think, based on the video card and CPU choices I've made.
I've actually purchased the Tsunami case now (as you might have read in another thread) so this is off the list. I got it for $70 at CompUSA...a deal I couldn't refuse.
For power supplies, I wanted something up to date that would support the rather...well...massive demands of CPUs and graphics cards these days and in the future. Also I wanted to try and cut down the number of adaptors, so I wanted something with connectors for PCI-Express graphics cards, SATA, and a 24-pin power for the motherboard. I also like what some manufacturers are doing with cooling in power supplies now, offering a single 120mm fan. This will make it almost silent, but offer excellent cooling if things start heating up.
It's a very basic rule with power supplies that the cooler they are, the better they work. It's always a good idea to buy more power supply than you need, because if it's not working hard, it will stay cool and provide the best power. I chose the Antec TruPower II 550W, for all the above reasons, and because I've had great experiences with Antec power supplies in the past. It offers 2 separate 12V rails, both pushing 19 Amps. Good stuff.
Antec TruPowerII 550W - $105
Optical drives
It's time to get a DVD drive. Whether it's a reader or a writer, the technology is mature, it's fast, and the capacity is essential for games these days. Nobody wants to install a game using 10 CDs.
DVD burners are pretty much a no-brainer, they burn and read everything, including dual-layer DVDs, and they cost so little. I've done a lot of reading and I've come no closer to knowing what brand is best to buy...but I've liked Samsung products in the past, so I'll go with them and tell you if it sucks. ;) There's an NEC for the same price... it got lots of good reviews...maybe I'll just flip a coin.
Samsung DVD burner (16x-4x-12x blah blah 5x DL) - $50 for retail box with Nero software
Monitor, keybord, mouse, speakers
07/27/2005 EDIT: Ok, I caved in and bought a Dell 2405FPW 24" flat panel. The panel itself is manufactured by Samsung, and is very good (maybe not quite as good as the SIPS panels from LG Phillips, but darn close). It's larger than its closest competition by an inch, and I got it with an internet coupon for $803 and free shipping. I couldn't say no. Now I'm definitely going to need that new-gen video card, to push Vanguard at 1920x1200. :D
For keyboards and mice, I don't think I'll be "upgrading". I use a microsoft trackball explorer (yes, I'm one of three gamers in the world who use a trackball) and it works great. I might go after a keyboard that's a little quieter than the one I have now, to quiet complaints from my wife about my heavy-handed typing, but I don't see myself spending more than about $50 on anything.
I use a fairly high-quality set of stereo headphones, from Panasonic. I'll be sticking with those, so I can enjoy my music or gaming without bugging the rest of the household.
So, currently that's what I'm looking at getting. Here's a summary -
Windows XP Pro SP2
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, Nforce4 SLI motherboard
2GB OCZ PC3200 DDRRAM dual-channel kit
Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 250GB SATA Hard drive
New-gen video card
Thermaltake Tsunami case
Antec TrupowerII 550W power supply
Samsung or NEC DVD DL burner
I'll keep you updated if I decide to make changes, and I'll certainly argue with...um, I mean discuss with...anyone who wants to make suggestions/comments/whatever.